Refuting Evolution

 

The following links entitled “Intelligent Creation vs. Mindless Chaos“, and “Age of the Earth“, are lectures that compares the theory of evolution with the teachings of Scripture, scientific facts, and archaeological discoveries. These two lectures reveals the fundamental flaws of the theory of evolution, as well as highlight the overwhelming proofs of Scripture’s account of creation. To watch debates between creationists and evolutionists, click on the link entitled “Kent Hovind Debates Evolutionists“.

Related Articles are listed below:

  1. Darwin’s Scientific Racism & It’s Fruit
  2. Eugenics According to Darwin
  3. Evolution, Darwin & Hitler

Darwin’s Scientific Racism & It’s Fruit

 

The following link entitled “Scientific Racism: The Eugenics of Social Darwinism” is a documentary of the monstrous actions of the philosophy of Darwinism.

Wikipedia.Org

On the Origin of Species, published on 24 November 1859, is a work of scientific literature by Charles Darwin which is considered to be the foundation of evolutionary biology. Its full title was On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. For the sixth edition of 1872, the short title was changed to The Origin of Species. Darwin’s book introduced the scientific theory that populations evolve over the course of generations through a process of natural selection. It presented a body of evidence that the diversity of life arose by common descent through a branching pattern of evolution.

Continue Reading…

To learn more about the races philosophy of Darwinism, click on the link entitled “Eugenics According to Darwin“.

Related articles are listed below:

  1. Evolution, Darwin & Hitler
  2. Eugenics and its Strange Advocates

Eugenics According to Darwin

Charles Darwin’s theories were used as a philosophical tool for the works of eugenicists. Darwin, on the other hand, was a races who was not willing, according to his writings, to be a harden sociopath, such as Hitler. Nevertheless, his races philosophy was the fuel for Social Darwinists and eugenicists.

The quotes below shows Darwin’s, eugenics, philosophy of the preferred races over the savage races, as well as a desire to purify the preferred race from it’s weak, sick, and handicap members, which is consistent with the practices of Nazi Germany.

Excerpt from “The Decent of Man”, Pages 1o3-104

With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination. We build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly anyone is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.The aid which we feel impelled to give to the helpless is mainly an incidental result of the instinct of sympathy, which was originally acquired as part of the social instincts, but subsequently rendered, in the manner previously indicated, more tender and more widely diffused. Nor could we check our sympathy, even at the urging of hard reason, without deterioration in the noblest part of our nature. The surgeon may harden himself whilst performing an operation, for he knows that he is acting for the good of his patient; but if we were intentionally to neglect the weak and helpless, it could only be for a contingent benefit, with an overwhelming present evil. Hence we must bear without complaining the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind; but there appears to be at least one check in steady action, namely the weaker and inferior members of society not marrying so freely as the sound; and this check might be indefinitely increased, though this is more to be hoped for than expected, by the weak in body or mind refraining from marriage.

Continue Reading…

Excerpt from “The Decent of Man”, Pages 121-122

The great break in the organic chain between man and his nearest allies, which cannot be bridged over by any extinct or living species, has often been advanced as a grave objection to the belief that man is descended from some lower form; but this objection will not appear of much weight to those who, from general reasons, believe in the general principle of evolution. Breaks often occur in all parts of the series, some being wide, sharp and defined, others less so in various degrees; as between the orang and its nearest allies—between the Tarsius and the other Lemuridae between the elephant, and in a more striking manner between the Ornithorhynchus or Echidna, and all other mammals. But these breaks depend merely on the number of related forms which have become extinct. At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

Continue Reading…

Noise of thunder Radio

Chris discusses an email recently received from a listener in England, who quoted from Charles Darwin’s “Descent of Man,” showing not only the racist implications of evolutionary theory, but the ominous and even deadly overtones of it. Can Darwin’s own words be refuted? Incredibly, evolutionists have attempted to do just that.

To listen to the program, click on the link entitled “THE DESCENT OF MAN“.

The History of Apostasy in America ~ By Chris Pinto

 

Noise of Thunder Radio

Today, we hear more about the history of how the church came to be in the position it is in today.  Is the apostasy in America only a few decades old, or has it been going on much longer than we think?  Hear clips from Bob Jones on Billy Graham.

To listen to the program, click on the link entitled “The History of Apostasy in America“.

Evolution, Darwin & Hitler

 

Wikipedia.Org

On the Origin of Species, published on 24 November 1859, is a work of scientific literature by Charles Darwin which is considered to be the foundation of evolutionary biology. Its full title was On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. For the sixth edition of 1872, the short title was changed to The Origin of Species. Darwin’s book introduced the scientific theory that populations evolve over the course of generations through a process of natural selection. It presented a body of evidence that the diversity of life arose by common descent through a branching pattern of evolution.

Continue Reading…

Noise of Thunder Radio

Chris discusses the role that evolutionary principles have had since the 16th century, and how they impacted the thinking of higher criticism, all as part of Rome’s plan to undermine the authority of the Bible. How has evolution impacted the modern world? And is it merely a coincidence that a Jesuit priest should be called “the father of the new age?”

To listen to the program, click on the link entitled “EVOLUTION & THE COUNTER REFORMATION“.

Noise of Thunder Radio

Chris discusses the controversy over the influence of evolutionary teaching in the Nazi movement of the 1930’s and 40’s. Today, many evolutionists have tried to deny the connection, and insist that Darwin’s theory is not “the science of racism” as many have said. But what does the record of history tell us?

To listen to the program, click on the link entitled “DARWIN & HITLER“.

Noise of Thunder Radio

Chris continues the discussion about the Darwinian connection to Hitler’s Nazi movement, and discusses whether or not making the connection between the two is a defensible argument. Does it make the church appear uneducated? Or is it something well known and agreed to among historians and university professors?

To listen to the program, click on the link entitled “DARWIN, HITLER & CHRISTIANITY“.

Eugenics and its Strange Advocates

 

Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, who was an outspoken advocate of eugenics.

Wikiquote.org

“We propose to hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. And we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
Commenting on the ‘Negro Project’ in a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, December 10, 1939. – Sanger manuscripts, Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also cited in “Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right”: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon

Continue Reading…

Planned Parenthood has always been used as a means of population control by elitists, and still is to this day. Most Planned Parenthood clinics are located in African American neighborhoods. One of the top killers of African Americans is abortion, and Planned Parenthood is one of the primary causes of this fact. Nevertheless, President Obama, and the NAACP, are advocates for Planned Parenthood, as seen below.

LifeNews.Com

The NAACP is not new to controversy when it comes to abortion and, in April, NAACP officials rushed to defend the nation’s largest abortion business after videos were released showing Planned Parenthood staffers helping alleged sex trafficking ring operators. A collection of 27 organizations, including the civil rights group, sent a letter to Congress asking lawmakers to resist the urge to support a bill sponsored by Congressman Mike Pence of Indiana to cut the millions in taxpayer funding the Planned Parenthood abortion business receives through the federal family planning program.

The NAACP passed a 2004 resolution voicing support for “equal access to abortion” and urging its members to participate in a pro-abortion rally in Washington. Then, in 2007, the NAACP, for the second time in four years, blocked a proposed resolution expressing opposition to abortion.

The Georgia chapter of the NAACP came under fire in 2010 for withdrawing its support for a bill advancing in the Georgia state legislature that would ban abortions done specifically because the child is African-American.

Continue Reading…

HuffingtonPost.Com

A Planned Parenthood clinic in Durham, N.C., was awarded a $426,000 Title X grant on Wednesday, just weeks after the state legislature overrode Gov. Bev Perdue’s (D) veto and cut $343,000 in state money from the provider’s budget. Anti-abortion lawmakers and advocacy groups are furious that the Department of Health and Human Services seems to have circumvented state legislatures to continue funding an organization they oppose.

“Yesterday President Obama said he supports Planned Parenthood because he wants his two daughters to be able to ‘control their own health care choices,'” Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List, said in a statement on Wednesday. “This morning we find that he once again is using euphemisms like ‘choice’ and ‘control’ to trample the rights of states and force pro-life taxpayers to fund the abortion business.”

Republican North Carolina State Rep. Nelson Dollar told the Boston Herald that the new grant to Planned Parenthood was “indicative of the federal government playing politics with taxpayer money.”

While Obama supports Planned Parenthood, the direct Title X grants are not exactly unusual: HHS has contracted directly with Planned Parenthood providers for years, including under former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. But the Planned Parenthood clinics that are receiving new federal grants this year are applying for those grants for the first time after defunding in their states created a need for federal money.

Paige Johnson, a spokesperson for the Planned Parenthood clinic in Durham, said that clinic has never appealed to HHS for Title X grants because it was always able to partner with the state. But after the state stopped contracting with Planned Parenthood, the clinic made the case to HHS that it is the primary provider of family planning to low-income women in the area. Under federal law, HHS is required to award grant funds in a manner that expands women’s access to care in the most cost-effective way possible in areas of the greatest need.

Continue Reading…

HHS.Gov

Over the past 40 years, Title X Family Planning clinics have played a critical role in ensuring access to a broad range of family planning and related preventive health services for millions of low-income or uninsured individuals and others.

History of Title X

The Title X Family Planning program [“Population Research and Voluntary Family Planning Programs” (Public Law 91-572)], was enacted in 1970 as Title X of the Public Health Service Act. Title X is the only Federal grant program dedicated solely to providing individuals with comprehensive family planning and related preventive health services. The Title X program is designed to provide access to contraceptive services, supplies and information to all who want and need them. By law, priority is given to persons from low-income families.

The Title X Family Planning program is administered within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of Population Affairs (OPA) by the Office of Family Planning (OFP). At least 90 percent of appropriated funding is used for clinical family planning services as described in the statute and regulations (45 CFR Part 59).

Activities

By law, Title X funds may not be used in programs where abortion is a method of family planning.

Continue Reading…

The following link entitled “Black Genocide in 21st Century America” is a documentary on the history of the eugenics movement, its transition into Planned Parenthood, and its ongoing agenda of population control by way of its decreasing of non-favored races.

Religious Intolerance & Blasphemy laws Pt. 12 – Ted Haggard Endorses Gay Marriage

ChristianPost.Com

“We’ve reached a point where human dignity and mutual respect is so important,” Haggard said in a recent online debate with Rabbi Benjamin Hecht, director of Orthodox Jewish think tank Nishma.

Responding to the question, “Should same-sex marriage be allowed by the state?” he went on to say, “If someone is dealing with same-sex attraction or homosexuality, and they want someone to be their life partner of the same gender, though we would oppose that in our churches, it should be allowed by the state.”

Jeremiah 5
30    A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land;
31    The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?
“Tolerance & coexistence” for the sake of “peace & security” are the marching orders for globalization. Matters of sin, righteousness, and judgment, on the other hand, are not tolerated in this new world order. Therefore, the mainstream media promotes phony Christian leaders, who will promote this agenda of peace and tolerance as though it were the calling of Christ to his church.
Matthew 10
34    Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
35    For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
36    And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.
37    He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.
38    And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.
39    He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.
Nevertheless, God’s word remains the same, and those who abide in it, will be vindicated, by God, as righteous, after the world labels them as intolerant, theological terrorists, hateful, bigots.
Sin cannot be endorsed by Christians, in anyway (not within, nor outside of the church), and especially not by church leaders.

Leviticus 18
22    Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
23    Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.
24    Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you:
25    And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.
26    Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you:
27    (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled;)
28    That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you.
29    For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people.
30    Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the LORD your God.

Leviticus 20
13    If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Judgment begins with the household of God, and it extends to the rest of the world. Therefore, Christians must never endorse sin, but it must always warn people of the seriousness of sin, God’s righteous standards, and his coming judgment upon the whole world, so that everyone will see their need to turn away from their sins, and believe the gospel of Jesus Christ, since it is the only hope for change, and escape from eternal punishment, for sinners.

As for Ted Haggard, and all of those like him, the word of God makes it very clear concerning, who they are, and what they are doing in the media.

Romans 16
17    Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
18    For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.

2John 1
8    Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.
9    Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
10    If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
11    For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

Matthew 7
15    Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
16    Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
17    Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
18    A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
19    Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
20    Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
21    Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22    Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23    And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.